Main content
Course: Medieval Europe + Byzantine > Unit 7
Lesson 2: Ottonian- Ottonian art, an introduction
- Bronze doors, Saint Michael's, Hildesheim, commissioned by Bishop Bernward, 1015
- Hildesheim Doors (quiz)
- The Raising of the Widow’s Son from the Dead (Magdeburg Panel)
- Gospel Book of Otto III
- Cross of Lothair II
- Ottonian art (quiz)
© 2024 Khan AcademyTerms of usePrivacy PolicyCookie Notice
Gospel Book of Otto III
By Dr. Andreas Petzold
The double page opening of the ruler portrait of Otto III and the accompanying image of provinces bringing tribute is taken from the Gospels of Otto III, one of the most magnificent manuscripts to have come down to us from the . It is thought to have been made about the year 1000 at the Benedictine monastery of Reichenau on Lake Constance where Austria, Switzerland, and Germany converge and belongs to a group of stylistically related manuscripts from the monastery known as the Liuthar group. The monk Liuthar is represented in another gospel-book made for Otto III that is now in the cathedral treasury at Aachen (Aachen, Domschatzkammer, G25). Liuthar is now thought to have been a scribe rather than an artist but the scribe was usually the main co-ordinating figure for a manuscript project.
The pages of the Gospels of Otto III manuscript measure 334 by 242 millimeters and are made of parchment. The script is written in ink, with gold initials, and the manuscript is extensively illustrated with portraits of the four evangelists (the authors of the four gospels), and scenes from the life of Christ as well as the ruler portrait. The front cover is decorated with precious jewels and inset with a Byzantine ivory representing the dormition or death of the Virgin Mary. The double-page is near the beginning of the manuscript before the gospel texts.
We do not know the name of the artist (as is the case for most of the painters from this period), but he most likely belonged to a team of craftsmen working on the manuscript. In devising the double opening, he appears not to have worked from his imagination but to have followed an earlier source such as the ruler portrait of Charles the Bald in the ninth-century manuscript known as the Codex Aureus of Saint Emmeram (Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm.14000, f. 5 v.).
On the right side of the double page, emperor Otto III is shown seated frontally, crowned, and holding a golden orb and a sceptre surmounted by an eagle. Otto III was the Holy Roman Emperor and nominally ruled over territories corresponding to modern-day Germany, France, and northern Italy. The title Holy Roman Emperor dates back to Charlemagne and like this earlier emperor, Otto III was crowned by the Pope in Rome where Otto III spent most of his reign. Otto III was Holy Roman Emperor from 996 to 1002, when he died at the age of 21.
Otto III looks out at us with hypnotic eyes, and is dressed in green and the imperial purple. He was the son of Otto II, who died when Otto III was three, and a Byzantine Princess called Theophanu, and we know that he was an educated man.
He is flanked on either side by members of his court: on the right by those who fight (two members of the nobility who carry a sword, a lance, and shield) and, on the left, by those who pray (two members of the clergy who hold books).
The pendant image depicts four personifications of the territories over which Otto ruled and who are shown bringing him tribute. They are identified as: Sclavinia (Slavic east), Germania (roughly Germany), Gallia (roughly France), and Roma (Rome). The device of the personification (whereby an abstract idea is represented by a human figure, usually a female one) goes back to classical art. There is a parallel between this scene and that of the adoration of the three magi (represented as crowned kings, a tenth-century innovation) bringing gifts to the infant Christ (represented on f.29 of the manuscript), which underlines the quasi-divine nature of the Emperor.
This is not a portrait in the conventional sense of a likeness and gives us very little idea of what Otto III must have looked like. Otto III is represented out of proportion with the much smaller figures that flank him—indicating his status. The opening pages probably represent an ideal of Otto III's rule rather than the reality of his situation as his rule was fraught with division. The style of the opening looks back to late antique illusionism (note, for example, the lozenge-shaped ornament in the borders, and the atmospheric backgrounds which recall, for example, such manuscripts as the Vatican Vergil made in about 400) but has an extraordinary flatness to it as if the scene has been pressed between two panes of glass.
This style is known as Ottonian, a period style concept that covers both the reigns of the three emperors bearing the name Otto and of their immediate successors through the late eleventh century. It both precedes and anticipates the Romanesque style.
After Otto’s death, the manuscript passed to his cousin and heir, Henry II, who gave it to the cathedral of Bamberg which he founded, where it remained until 1803, when during the secularization of the church, it was transferred to the Bavarian State Library. The manuscript is rarely exhibited, but a facsimile of it has been made.
Essay by Dr. Andreas Petzold
Want to join the conversation?
- I have a question that doesn't only refer to this text, it just came back into my mind because also for the book mentioned in this text there was a part of the cover decorated with ivory, so I wonder:
where did the artists at that time get the ivory from?(5 votes)- Medieval European ivory came from several sources. Some was elephant ivory via trade from Africa or Asia, some was walrus ivory from the north, and some was mammoth ivory from animals that had died long ago but whose bodies were revealed when permafrost receded especially in Russia. It is possible to distinguish each type based on its grain.(7 votes)
- Well, that was confusing. I read that section the same way the other participant did-Otto III died at 3 or whatever. Have not experienced something that confusing before.(3 votes)
- yea? what does it mean by he died at 3? age or some kind of period ?(1 vote)
- Why does Charles the Bald have hair?(3 votes)
- 1. Charles the Bald may not have always been bald. Perhaps this is a portrait of him in younger age.
2. Early Medieval art is rarely "representational." There may have been a tradition of drawing kings a certain way, regardless of what the king looked like. Perhaps the artist was drawing on a previous image, which depicted a king with hair.
3. Okay, this doen't answer your question, but I think it's a really fun and awesome story:
In the mid-9th century, the bishop of Mainz was a bald fellow named Hatto. So a monk named Hucbald wrote a Latin poem in praise of bald men -- which he dedicated to the bishop. What's amazing about the poem is that every single word begins in the letter "c." So the opening lines are "Carmina convitii cerritus, carpere calvos" which translates something like, "A crazy, noisy song has mocked bald men..." The poem goes in this vein for about 150 c-lettered lines. Apparently there were lots of bald people and lots of poetry in the Carolingian world! (http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1v6296zv#page-1)(3 votes)
- In the "Adoration of the Magi" illustration, whose face is depicted at the top of the middle column?(1 vote)
- Does anyone have any idea of the significance, if any, of the two dogs in Otto III's portrait?(1 vote)
- Why did Otto III die at such a young age?(1 vote)
- A short look at his parents' ages at death, and the fact that his brother died even BEFORE their father, makes me suspect that he was from a 'not-very-long-lived' line of people. His own death was, it was noted, "unexpected".(1 vote)