If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

Main content

Evaluating the argument

Three Cheers for Enhancement? Evaluate and discuss the argument presented in this video.
Consider the following range of views on the ongoing pursuit of biomedical enhancement:
  1. Biomedical enhancements have such great potential to improve our lives that we need to keep pushing forward enthusiastically, confident in our ability to mitigate any problems that might arise along the way—just as we’ve done regarding other technological breakthroughs.
  2. Although biomedical enhancements hold tremendous promise, they also come with some risk. Therefore, we should pursue these enhancements at a slower pace, ready to pause and reassess, or even abandon a given enhancement when it starts to raise significant concerns.
  3. Biomedical enhancements are more likely to unravel the fabric of our lives than improve them. So we should generally stop pursuing them—with the exception of those rare enhancements that are extremely likely to make enormous contributions to the preservation and enrichment of human life.
  4. Biomedical enhancements directly undermine the conditions, relationships, and character traits that ground the value and dignity of human life. We don’t need these enhancements and should stop pursuing them.
Now, take some time - by yourself or with others - to reflect openly, yet critically, on the ethical considerations raised by the various perspectives, and determine where you stand on this issue. What do YOU think, and why?

Want to join the conversation?

No posts yet.